next up previous
Next: 3 DISCUSSION Up: FORMATION OF QUASAR NUCLEI Previous: 1 INTRODUCTION

2 FORMATION OF QUASAR NUCLEI IN THE HEART OF ULIGs

Morphological features of ULIGs suggest that most ULIGs come from mergers between or among galaxies (Sanders et al. 1988a; Taniguchi, & Shioya 1998). Another important property of the ULIGs is that they are very gas rich; e.g., (Sanders et al. 1988a; Scoville et al. 1991; Downes & Solomon 1998). Therefore, the progenitor galaxies of ULIGs are rich in gas such as giant spiral galaxies. Since intense starbursts are observed in many ULIGs, the most probable formation mechanism of SMBHs is the collapse of compact remnants of massive stars (Weedman 1983; Norman & Scoville 1988). Another important issue is whether or not progenitor galaxies had SMBHs originally in their nuclei. Although masses of SMBHs in nearly spiral galaxies (i.e., progenitor galaxies of ULIGs) are of the order of at most (e.g., Kormendy et al. 1998 and references therein), these seed SMBHs could grow due to gas accretion in circumnuclear dense-gas regions during the course of the merger. Therefore, we consider two cases; 1) at least one progenitor had a SMBH with , and 2) no progenitor had a SMBH.

2.1 Mergers between/among Nucleated Galaxies

If a progenitor galaxy had a SMBH in its nucleus, this seed SMBH could grow in mass during the course of merger because the central region of a ULIG is very gas-rich. Such gas accretion may be efficient within the central 1 kpc region because the gas density is quite high in the central region; i.e., cm (Scoville, Yun, & Bryant 1997; Downes & Solomon 1998). We here consider the classical Bondi-type (Bondi 1952) gas accretion onto the SMBH. This gas accretion rate is given by

where , , , and are the mass of a hydrogen atom, the number density of the hydrogen atom, the accretion radius defined as ( is the mass of the seed SMBH), and the effective relative velocity between the seed SMBH and the ambient gas, respectively. A typical dynamical mass of the central 1 kpc region is of the order of . Suppose that the SMBH with mass of is sinking toward the dynamical center of the merger. Its orbital velocity is km s, where is the dynamical mass of the central 1 kpc region of the merger and is the radius in units of 1 kpc. The crossing time of the SMBH is years. Therefore, the merging time scale is estimated to be years (e.g., Barnes 1989). Adopting an average gas density in the circumnuclear regions of ULIGs to be cm, we obtain the accreting gas mass during the course of merger;

where is the mass of SMBH in units of , is the average gas density in units of cm, is the orbital velocity with respect to the ambient gas in units of 100 km s, and is the merger time scale in units of years. This estimate implies that the seed SMBH cannot grow up to if the seed SMBH is less massive than . Since the ULIGs come from mergers between two galaxies or among several galaxies, their progenitor galaxies should be very giant spiral galaxies in order to pile up molecular gas up to in their central regions (e.g., Sanders et al. 1988a). In fact, nearby spiral galaxies such as M31 and NGC 4258 have SMBHs with a few [e.g., Kormendy et al. (1998) and references therein; see also Miyoshi et al. (1995) for the case of NGC 4258]. Therefore, it seems quite likely that the seed SMBH may be more massive than that adopted in the above estimate. If the seed SMBH is more massive than a few , it could grow up to . Although we have no knowledge about the seed SMBHs in the progenitors, our estimates given here suggest that the gas accretion in the dense gas clouds onto the seed SMBH can lead to the formation of a quasar nucleus in the heart of ULIGs.

2.2 Mergers between/among Non-nucleated Galaxies

Next we consider a case where there is no seed SMBH in the progenitor galaxies of ULIGs. In this case, a possible way to form quasar nuclei in ULIGs is to pile up the circumnuclear star clusters of compact remnants of massive stars; black holes and neutron stars, each of which has a few at most. This issue was pioneeringly discussed by Weedman (1983). Using both starburst models by Gehrz, Sramek, & Weedman (1983) and optical spectroscopic observations (i.e., H luminosity), he suggested that starburst galaxies with L(H) erg s could produce compact starburst remnants up to . However, since the H luminosity of starburst galaxies is dominated by the most massive stars in the starburst region, it seems hard to estimate the total mass of compact remnants solely using L(H). Thus, the estimate by Weedman (1983) may provide a rough upper limit for the compact remnant mass in the starburst galaxies. Norman & Scoville (1988) also discussed the formation of quasar nuclei in ULIGs. However, their assumption (a coeval, massive-star cluster of within the central 10 pc region) turns out to be unlikely because the recent high-resolution optical and near-infrared imaging by the Hubble Space Telescope of the ULIGs have shown that blue star clusters are distributed in the circumnuclear regions up to a few kpc (Shaya et al. 1994; Surace et al. 1998; Scoville et al. 1998). Although the central star cluster associated with the western nucleus of Arp 220 is very luminous and its mass is estimated to be , typical masses of the circumnuclear star clusters are of the order of at most (Shaya et al. 1994; Scoville et al. 1998; Shioya, Taniguchi, & Trentham 1998; see also Taniguchi, Trentham, & Shioya 1998). Although some star clusters may be hidden because of heavy extinction (Scoville et al. 1991; Genzel et al. 1998), we firstly investigate whether or not the star clusters found both in the optical and in the near infrared (NIR) (Shaya et al. 1994; Scoville et al. 1998) will be responsible for the formation of a SMBH with .

Shaya et al. (1994) discussed the fate of circumnuclear star clusters; since these clusters will lose their kinetic energy to individual stars during random encounters (i.e., dynamical friction), they will sink toward the merger center within years. Here, from a viewpoint of dynamical relaxation of the star clusters, we examine whether or not compact remnants formed in the circumnuclear star-forming clusters can make a SMBH with . For simplicity, we consider a case where ten circumnuclear star-forming clusters, each of which has a total stellar mass of , are distributed within a few kpc. It is known that stars with produce compact remnants. We estimate how many such massive stars are formed in each cluster.

We assume that stars are formed with a Salpeter-like initial mass function (IMF);

where m is the stellar mass in units of and is a normalization constant determined by the relation

which leads to

The number of stars with a mass range is estimated as

Using in equation (5), we re-write equation (6) as

There are three free parameters; the power index (), and the upper and lower mass limits of the IMF ( and ). Since stars with produce compact remnants, we set and . In Table 1, we give results for some possible combinations of the parameters. Although = 1.35 is the canonical value for stars in the solar neighborhood, there are some lines of evidence that massive stars are more preferentially formed in such violent star-forming regions; i.e., a top-heavy initial mass function with (e.g., Goldader et al. 1997 and references therein). Therefore, we adopt a case of , and . In this case, there are massive stars with in each cluster. Each compact remnant has a mass from a few (for neutron stars) to several (for black holes). Therefore, the total mass of compact remnants in each cluster is . Such ten clusters will be relaxed dynamically with a time scale of

where is the typical size of a circumnuclear region with ten star clusters in units of 1 kpc and is the mass of the clusters in units of . Therefore, we expect that a SMBH with mass of will be made years after the onset of circumnuclear starbursts in ULIGs. This mass is smaller than that necessary for quasar nuclei (i.e., ). Each cluster of compact remnants would be able to gain its mass by gas accretion as discussed in section 2.1. However, the accreted mass is estimated to be for ten clusters in total, being still less massive than .

Here it should be again remembered that all star clusters in the central region of ULIGs cannot be observed in both the optical and the NIR because inferred extinction toward the nuclei of ULIGs is very large; e.g., 50 mag (Genzel et al. 1998; Scoville et al. 1991). Therefore, it is quite likely that the majority of nuclear star clusters in ULIGs are hidden by a large amount of gas and dust. Recently, Shioya et al. (1998) analyzed the optical-NIR spectral energy distributions of nuclear star clusters in Arp 220. They found that these clusters are more massive systematically (i.e., ) than circumnuclear ones but can account only for about one-seventh of the total bolometric luminosity of Arp 220. Although OH megamaser sources found in the central region of Arp 220 may provide possible evidence for hidden AGN (Diamond et al. 1989; Lonsdale et al. 1998), the recent mid-infrared spectroscopy of a sample of ULIGs has shown that the majority of the ULIGs such as Arp 220 are powered by nuclear starbursts (Genzel et al. 1998; Lutz et al. 1998). Therefore, it is strongly suggested that some hidden star clusters should be responsible for the remaining () bolometric luminosity of Arp 220. Since compact remnants produced in the hidden clusters will join to form a SMBH, it is expected that a SMBH with will be formed in the heart of ULIGs.



next up previous
Next: 3 DISCUSSION Up: FORMATION OF QUASAR NUCLEI Previous: 1 INTRODUCTION



Jun Makino
Wed Mar 17 17:58:32 JST 1999